In a mini-trial, each attorney presents a short version of his or her case to the other side with a neutral judge maintaining order. This jury interaction can lead to a quick settlement between the parties, thereby avoiding protracted litigation.
#DONT OFFER RESOLUTIONERS ADVIC TRIAL#
One of the benefits of a summary jury trial is that, after the summary trial is done, the attorneys and parties interact with the jury and can ask the jurors why they reached their conclusion and which issues were most important to them. Live witnesses are seldom called to testify with the attorneys simply summarizing the evidence that would likely be presented in the case actually went to court.
The presentations usually last a half or full-day. In a summary jury trial, attorneys for each side make an abbreviated presentation of their case to an actual jury who will render a verdict, which is typically non-binding. Should you desire to resolve your dispute out of court, understanding each kind of ADR will help you decide which type is most proper for your particular case.
The Indiana Supreme Court adopted five forms of ADR to help resolve disputes without having to go to trial:įederal Courts allow for similar ADR, but this post will focus on ADR in State Court. For decades, our justice system has seen an explosion of litigation to the point that courts now struggle to handle all of the lawsuits. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is an alternative way to resolve disputes.
0 kommentar(er)
